Monthly Archives: January 2011

Poll Responses on How to Cut the Deficit – Graphic –

If you had to choose one, which would you be willing to change in order to cut government spending?

Answer: Military. Doesn’t matter much whether the respondents were GOP, Independents, or Dems.

It’s interesting how much in line we all are.


Be a Google power user


I knew a few of these, but the cache: operator was new to me and has already saved me several steps (I used to search for the URL, then click on the cache link).

It’s the interface, stupid

Some might find that “Windows everywhere” strategy to be so 1990s. It’s worth pointing out, though, that it’s the same strategy followed by its competition. Apple has extended a modified version of Mac OS X across form factors, and Google pushes Linux (by way of Android) from its backend through to mobile phones. The consistency advantages has a lot to recommend it, particularly given the massive base of products that work with desktop Windows.

“Windows everywhere” will not work. Microsoft has shown repeatedly that they think the standard windows interface is suitable for every device from phones to servers, with minor tweaks. Windows Phone 7 is a major departure from that strategy, but I haven’t heard Microsoft include it in the concept of “Windows everywhere.”

This simply won’t work, and to compare it to Apple’s or Google’s OS strategies is laughable. Yes, the underlying OS for both iOS and OS X is the same. And both Google’s servers and Android start from Linux. So what? No one using iOS or Android cares what file system it uses or how it manages memory. They care about how it works for them, and that’s the interface.

Again, Windows Phone 7 is a tremendous departure for Microsoft. But if they try to combat the iPad with something that looks anything like Windows 7, they will lose, and lose hard.

That *is* a retina display — iPad 2 Likely to Have 2048×1536 Screen Resolution – Mac Rumors


The iPad is used at a greater distance than the iPhone; 260 DPI *is* a retina display.

I’ve seen a number of articles like this, suggesting that Apple is going to double the resolution of the display in the next iPad because of some of the graphics they’ve found digging around in the iOS. The articles say that while 260 DPI is good, it’s “not quite a ‘Retina’ display.” That’s rubbish. The typical distance between the iPad and your eyes is greater than when you’re using the iPhone. The difference between the (rumored) resolution of the iPad 2 and the iPhone 4 is just 25%, so if you hold the iPhone at a foot and the iPad at 18 inches, the iPad will have a *higher* apparent resolution.